information about how you use ‘Get help with ESFA services’. We use this information to make the
website work as well as possible and improve government services.
You have accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any
This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.
Created 28 April 2021 16:17
We have recently moved systems to PICS and there is a handy function to import the PLR data from the LRS. Our Operations team have asked if the exported spreadsheet from PICS along with a screen grab from PICS showing the source of data and date and time stamp would be sufficient as evidence at audit instead of the report generated from the LRS.
I'm not sure if any PICS users that have been through ESFA audit have used this type of evidence before and had no issues with it (let alone EPAO's). I've added images for illustrative purposes to demonstrate what the Ops team want to use instead. Would appreciate my peers thoughts.
No one has replied to this post.
I would think you will still need a copy of the PLR at audit as it is specified in the rules although an Auditor may accept alternative evidence.
28 April 2021 16:30
Whilst a fantastic idea, and only I raised with the PLR team some years ago for PICS and other MIS Systems. The issue is how to prove that the data imported into the MIS system has not been amended since. For that reason alone a pdf version of the plr at the time, or a printed version, is usually seen as the only core evidence.
That said, I did ask, and believe it should still be considered that the ability to download the PLR via the API route and directly into mis systems as a dated attachment should be provided so that it will make for a more efficient process.
29 April 2021 19:58
Thanks guys. I kind of knew the answer already but thought I'd ask anyway.
Worth a try!
30 April 2021 16:36