information about how you use ‘Get help with ESFA services’. We use this information to make the
website work as well as possible and improve government services.
You have accepted all cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any
This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.
Created 13 May 2021 16:47
I know I know the answer to this but doing a sanity check.
If a learner is on a break in learning and then whilst on the break changes employer, this has to be classed as a withdrawal and restart with a new employer right?
No one has replied to this post.
Ooh, now you've got me thinking. If the gap in *employment* was less than 30 days, would it be a w/d? Could you not just put the new employer and residual TNPs on the return from break records?
14 May 2021 11:36
Exactly that Steveh. There was a 3 day gap in ending employment and starting new one. The BIL was COVID related too - employer related rather than the learner and the learner is really keen and is progressing so well. I find it harsh to w/d and then restart - really impacts us as the provider.
As for your suggestion, that's exactly what I'm thinking!
14 May 2021 11:47
Can't help but agree with Steveh's suggestion, seems entirely reasonable and I'd also want to protect our QAR. The BIL flowchart questions are slightly open to interpretation;
Would be interested to know the Service Desk's opinion. The only sticky bit would be, what TNP do you add on the new ILR? For a normal return from BIL you record the original price.. but if a learner changes employer you record the residual cost based on the negotiation of what's left to deliver. Which would it be in this case??
15 May 2021 07:05 (Edited)
Hi all, I tried that recently but no dice - the service desk told me:
Thank you for contacting the ESFA Service Centre. You need to amend to a withdrawal from the break in learning date and then record a new start as per the PSM, return without an agreed break.
Recording restarts (without an agreed break in learning)
The following guidance applies in scenarios such as where a learner has withdrawn from their learning for a reason other than an agreed break in learning or transfer, and subsequently returns to learning on the same aim(s).
When the learner withdraws, their learning aims must be closed with the relevant code in the Withdrawal reason field. Refer to guidance for recording leaner absence or withdrawal.
If the learner later returns to learning, the new aims must be created. Refer to guidance below for recording new aims when a learner restarts..
The original learning aims must not be re-opened.
PSM 2021-22. Provider support manual: Recording breaks in learning, transfers and restarts (fasst.org.uk)
17 May 2021 08:40
Victoria Mansfield I also received the same message from the ESFA when I was advised to contact them.
Seems highly unfair, especially in times of a global pandemic but we've got to play ball, haven't we?...
19 May 2021 08:30
Steveh Ben James - looking for your opinions on the back of this thread as again, I'm questioning what should be done with this issue:
Learner on a BIL. Whilst on a BIL the company he works for merges with someone else so there's a new TAS account and different employer name now registered on companies house.
The learner has not technically changed employer. This all happened whilst he was on a BIL. Surely this wouldn't be a withdrawal on the return to learning? Just employer records updated?
Voices of sanity....please help!
03 November 2021 10:22
Ugh, think it is a change of employer though (particularly given there's a new AS account!)?
I'd forgotten about this advice, and I can kind of get it where it's the learner's action to move employer, but when it's beyond their control it feels even harsher (I'd argue the rules need a *whole section* about TUPEing, almost as though Civil Servants never have to worry about it...)
03 November 2021 10:54
It does feel harsh, doesn't it?
I will now have to withdraw the learner as I don't have any evidence of him in learning during the merger taking place as he was on a BIL (sounds like I'm Ross from Friends constantly at the moment - WE WERE ON A BREAK!) and then a reinstatement because the gap between his last date in learning and his restart date under a new employer is more than 30 days. Where is the fairness in this? Both learner and training provider disadvantaged with another set of paperwork to complete to boot!
Wish we had emoji ability to visually depict my frustration.
03 November 2021 12:43