Chris Baker
Last activity
Member since
Votes
1
Subscriptions
21
Replies
Chris Baker commented,
Hi Steve Thanks, I've already contacted our contract Manager and kept him up to speed with the problems Thanks Chris
Hi Steve Thanks, I've already contacted our contract Manager and kept him up to speed with the problems Thanks Chris
Chris Baker commented,
Hi Steve Thanks, its not just me then by the looks of it I've just this second had this back from ESFA service desk, but no help really !!! CI-0227742 Dear Chris Thank you for contacting us. I will be taking your enquiry forward for investigation and will get back to you with an answer as soon as possible. Kind regards Kim ESFA Customer Service
Hi Steve Thanks, its not just me then by the looks of it I've just this second had this back from ESFA service desk, but no help really !!! CI-0227742Dear ChrisThank you for contacting us. I will...
Chris Baker commented,
Thanks Steve Is there any chance that you could point me in the direction of the guidance for this and I can pass this on to the other party ? Thanks Chris
Thanks Steve Is there any chance that you could point me in the direction of the guidance for this and I can pass this on to the other party ? Thanks Chris
Chris Baker commented,
Hi Two questions from the above post Does the above message mean that I wont receive the completion payment If I ask the employer for a payment now that the apprentice is complete and they agree to pay it,how do I record this on the ILR and what date do I use for PRM Thanks Chris
Hi Two questions from the above post Does the above message mean that I wont receive the completion payment If I ask the employer for a payment now that the apprentice is complete and they agree ...
Chris Baker commented,
Hi Again I've just had this response from the Service Desk and wanted to gauge peoples thoughts !! (below in bold) It was a genuine admin error, as we failed to tick the SEM field for this 16-18 apprentice,however I'm sure the employer won't pay us the contribution as they are a SMALL EMPLOYER and this will now cost us a completion payment plus we have already had to pay the EPAO. Dear Chris Baker, You previously raised an incident with our Specialist Support team. The Specialist Support team have been in touch today with the following response: We would not allow the use of the LDM code in this case. The SEM code to waive co-investment must be added to the ILR at the start of the apprenticeship - not in a later academic year. This is as per the apprenticeship technical funding guide - We determine whether we waive co-investment from the size of the employer at the start of the apprentice's programme; this determines whether we waive co-investment for the rest of the apprenticeship with that employer The lack of payment of co-investment will result in the provider not receiving the completion payment.
Hi Again I've just had this response from the Service Desk and wanted to gauge peoples thoughts !! (below in bold) It was a genuine admin error, as we failed to tick the SEM field for this 16-18 ap...
Chris Baker commented,
With regards to this topic,I've just received this reply from the A/S As the error was not rectified prior the R14 deadline - this co-investment will remain as due on your Co-investment contributions report. This cannot now be adjusted and the co-investment due will need to be recorded in your ILR. Can I clarify that if I apply to use LDM code 361,will this mean that it waives the expected employer contribution for the previous contract year ? Thanks Chris
With regards to this topic,I've just received this reply from the A/S As the error was not rectified prior the R14 deadline - this co-investment will remain as due on your Co-investment contributio...
Chris Baker commented,