Steveh
MIS and Funding specialist with over 20 years of experience! Remembers submitting funding returns on floppy disks through the post...
Last activity
Member since
Votes
15
Subscriptions
620
Replies
Steveh commented,
I think they'll all be fine, they've just not been updated yet. There's certainly been nothing to suggest that they (by which I mean *all* non-reg aims) won't be rolled over.
I think they'll all be fine, they've just not been updated yet. There's certainly been nothing to suggest that they (by which I mean *all* non-reg aims) won't be rolled over.
Steveh commented,
Agree with Phil, but I'm hearing rumours that ARCs aren't being issued to all Asylum Seekers any more (there was definitely a backlog during the pandemic)... They should have *something* from the Home Office (possibly a "bail letter"?) with their date of application/arrival on, or if not, something from a solicitor would do at a push.
Agree with Phil, but I'm hearing rumours that ARCs aren't being issued to all Asylum Seekers any more (there was definitely a backlog during the pandemic)... They should have *something* from the H...
Steveh commented,
You're correct Ben, definitely wouldn't use partial ach on a programme aim.
You're correct Ben, definitely wouldn't use partial ach on a programme aim.
Steveh commented,
So, they can't go to Gateway without the proof they've got M&E. Once you've got that, they'll go to Gateway and then, once they've completed their EPA, you can claim the completion payment, there is no real time limit to it.
So, they can't go to Gateway without the proof they've got M&E. Once you've got that, they'll go to Gateway and then, once they've completed their EPA, you can claim the completion payment, there i...
Steveh commented,
Afraid I can offer you nothing but "hopes and prayers" and confirm you are not alone...
Afraid I can offer you nothing but "hopes and prayers" and confirm you are not alone...
Steveh commented,
Going to depend what hours they're working. If it's under 16 it might count as (capital U) Unemployed by the AEB definition. If it's more than that, just go for Low Wage, not worth assessing the benefit, just the wage.
Going to depend what hours they're working. If it's under 16 it might count as (capital U) Unemployed by the AEB definition. If it's more than that, just go for Low Wage, not worth assessing the be...
Steveh commented,
Hi Mike So, there's no *official* funding rule definition of the gap. The month thing is because they'll appear on the PDSAT report if it's longer than a month, but that's so you can then explain it to auditors (and "they stopped one in July and didn't start the new one til September" is a reasonable explanation). In fact, the main thing you need to be careful of is the 120 day gap which QAR uses. Any transfer where there's not a new start within 120 days will be considered a fail on your QAR, but assuming they get to June this year and start the new one in September it should be fine (almost as though that's why they settled on 120 days for it...)
Hi Mike So, there's no *official* funding rule definition of the gap. The month thing is because they'll appear on the PDSAT report if it's longer than a month, but that's so you can then explain i...
Steveh commented,
Shame it wasn't in Update today (see also: Why hasn't Inform been published for five months?).
Shame it wasn't in Update today (see also: Why hasn't Inform been published for five months?).
Steveh commented,
Yes, they would, because Area Cost uplift is defined by delivery postcode, not learner home postcode. Somewhat of a vexed question as to whether you're entitled to Area Cost uplift for ALL delivery if you're delivering online...
Yes, they would, because Area Cost uplift is defined by delivery postcode, not learner home postcode. Somewhat of a vexed question as to whether you're entitled to Area Cost uplift for ALL delivery...
Steveh commented,
Yeah, if some of your delivery generates Area Cost Uplift (ie is in London and the South East) and some doesn't (and check your delivery location postcodes aren't ZZ99 9ZZ!) that would explain the discrepancy.
Yeah, if some of your delivery generates Area Cost Uplift (ie is in London and the South East) and some doesn't (and check your delivery location postcodes aren't ZZ99 9ZZ!) that would explain the ...